翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Cahaba Prison ・ Cahaba River ・ Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge ・ Cahaba River Wildlife Management Area ・ Cahaba, Alabama ・ Cahaba, Marion and Greensboro Railroad ・ Cahaboncito River ・ Cahabón River ・ Cahagnes ・ Cahagnolles ・ Cahaignes ・ Cahal Daly ・ Cahal Pech ・ Cahal Pech Village Resort ・ Cahalan Ó Corcrán ・ Cahaly v. LaRosa ・ Cahama ・ Cahan ・ Cahan (surname) ・ Cahan, Orne ・ Cahangirbəyli ・ Caharet ・ Cahas Mountain Rural Historic District ・ Cahaya Di Langit Itu ・ Cahaya LRT Station ・ CAHDI ・ CAHDİ Party ・ Cahela ・ Cahen ・ Cahen's constant Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Cahaly v. LaRosa ： ウィキペディア英語版 Cahaly v. LaRosa ''Cahaly v. LaRosa'' is a lawsuit filed in federal court in 2013 that challenged South Carolina's law prohibiting most types of unsolicited consumer and political calls made by Automatic Dialing and Announcing Devices (ADAD), also known as "robocalls". The plaintiff won in U.S. district court in June 2014, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in part, while vacating part in August 2015. ==Background== On November 3, 2010, campaign consultant Robert Cahaly was arrested by the State Law Enforcement Division (SLED), being charged for making illegal robocalls to six state house districts.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= GOP consultant arrested for illegal "robocalls" )〕 The automated opinion polling system asked whether U.S. Speaker Nancy Pelosi should be invited to campaign with six Democratic candidates for the South Carolina Legislature.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= Call Me Unconstitutional: Hang-Up For SC's Robocall Law )〕 Cahaly was arrested despite having a written opinion from the state attorney general stating that he had acted within the law.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= Fourth Circuit: SC Robocall Ban Is Unconstitutional )〕 The charges were subsequently dismissed in October 2012.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= Charges Against GOP Consultant Cahaly Dropped )〕 After the charges were dropped, Cahaly filed a suit against state officials (including SLED Chief Reginald Lloyd), claiming his constitutional right to free speech had been violated. U.S. district court judge, Michelle Childs ruled that the anti-robocall statute was a content-based restriction on speech and therefore unconstitutional.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= Fed Court rules law Cahaly charged under unconstitutional )〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Cahaly v. LaRosa」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.